Previous Entry | Next Entry

Madeleine L'Engle

bad day kitten
died last night. Even if you weren't a big fan, if you only liked one book, you might feel the universe shift just a little bit. If you liked a lot of her 60 published books, I imagine your universe just shifted a lot.

I only liked one book, A Wrinkle In Time, but it had a major effect on me. In it I met my first profoundly gifted kid, Charles Wallace. And I met myself, Meg Murry. (Though I didn't have the braces, and I wanted them. Those were days when I was enraged with the world. I wanted to be able to bare teeth covered with barbed wire at those who vexed me.) I had never met myself in a book before. I never again felt quite so alone as I had felt before I read A Wrinkle in Time. Madeleine L'Engle knew I existed, and she liked me enough to put me in a book, at a time when nobody liked me.

L'Engle was ill a lot, these last ten years, so for her sake I'm glad she's put off this mortal shell. The way I see it, Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who, and Mrs. Which came for their old friend at last.

We've lost two bright lights this week. That hurts.

Comments

( 33 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]thatwasjen wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 08:43 pm (UTC)
Oh, this is sad news (although not entirely a surprise). I liked A Wrinkle in Time, and it helped make me the genre fan I am today, but I utterly cherish And Both Were Young. It's one of the five or six books I re-read annually.

Damn.
[info]queenbookwench wrote:
Sep. 10th, 2007 01:11 am (UTC)
I love And Both Were Young, too! It was my first L'Engle, when I was in middle school, and I still have a deep and sentimental fondness for it. I didn't realize anyone else liked that book!
[info]filkferengi wrote:
Sep. 10th, 2007 09:21 pm (UTC)
I just got a discarded copy of this at the library book sale a couple of weeks ago. Seems like a good time to reread it.
[info]just_shai wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 08:48 pm (UTC)
Man, I feel like I have a hole in my heart. Not quite as bad as losing Andre Norton, but still, kinda achey.
[info]janni wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 08:49 pm (UTC)
I was Meg Murray, too. Seeing myself in a book was a huge comfort. I was always grateful to have Meg as part of my adolescence.
[info]tammy212 wrote:
Sep. 9th, 2007 11:38 pm (UTC)
>>I was Meg Murray, too. Seeing myself in a book was a huge comfort.<<

She gives us permission to be fierce, and fierce is a quality not encouraged in girls.
[info]unusualmusic wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 08:51 pm (UTC)
I loved her books. I will miss her.
[info]ladyjoust wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 09:11 pm (UTC)
A Swiftly Tilting Planet was the book that made me want to be a writer. I was so struck by the way the story was crafted, by the different threads that wove in and out and then all came together, beautiful and bittersweet, at the end, that I knew I wanted to do that: to tell stories, and tell them so very well.

I'll miss her.
[info]box_in_the_box wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 09:20 pm (UTC)
I never recognized Meg Murry ...
... Until I found out that so many women I knew, like you, saw themselves in her.

Looking back on it, A Wrinkle in Time actually helps me understand how women might feel, being "othered" by the fiction they read, because while the story itself included enough compelling concepts to keep me reading, everything that came from Meg's point of view felt like a completely foreign language to me (bear in mind, I was in early grade school at the time), and when I realized that Calvin O'Keefe was meant to be "the boy" of the story, in the sense of being anything approaching the male counterpart of the female hero, I suppose my reaction was similar to that of women who realize that "the girl" of any given male-oriented story is somehow meant to represent them.

Good writer, interesting ideas, but trying to relate to her characters' emotions felt like trying to think in Russian. Then again, us boys could benefit from being forced to think in a foreign language every now and then.
[info]tammy212 wrote:
Sep. 9th, 2007 11:36 pm (UTC)
Re: I never recognized Meg Murry ...
>>when I realized that Calvin O'Keefe was meant to be "the boy" of the story, in the sense of being anything approaching the male counterpart of the female hero, I suppose my reaction was similar to that of women who realize that "the girl" of any given male-oriented story is somehow meant to represent them.<<

This makes sense to me. She was better from the inside of feminine heads--some of us are.

And all of us improve on trying to think in new languages, of all kinds. Heinlein called it "acquiring a new cognitive map." The more we try, the more comprehensible those foreign idioms get. Next thing you know, we're finding the things we have in common, which is a good thing. Othering can slide out the window.
[info]poeticloner wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 10:21 pm (UTC)
Oh dear, that does hurt a lot.
[info]silent_muse06 wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 10:30 pm (UTC)
I grew up with A Wrinkle in Time. L'Engle was a beautiful writer.
[info]ratesjul wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 10:33 pm (UTC)
I love your note about Mrs Whatsit, Mrs Who and Mrs Which coming for their friend at last.

The world DOES shift, knowing this sad news. I am going to start rereading soon, I think. I think I need to.
[info]jhyanmar wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 10:52 pm (UTC)
The problem I have these days, is that with the exception of younger awesome authors like yourself, my absolute favorites tend to be, well, old or dead -_-;;. I keep turning around and seeing another Great One dying and it rips another piece of my heart away.

But, still. To me, the universe shifted from the presence of her writing in the first place when she wrote. What I'm feeling now is a loss of that shift; a loss of a vital force of imagination and growth of the human spirit. It's drifting, now, that I'm feeling; wondering where the next push, the next light will come from.
[info]silent_muse06 wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 12:19 am (UTC)
I know. I felt awful when Lloyd Alexander died--I grew up with his books too. They introduced me to the fantasy genre and mythology, too. And since his stories were largely based on Welsh myth, I started researching my own heritage (Welsh). My life is so much richer because of his wonderful books. If I ever have kids, I am reading them Lloyd Alexander.
[info]jhyanmar wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 06:12 am (UTC)
I had managed to forget about that death, until it got brought up in one of the discussions about Ms. l'Engle. It hit like a brick, slamming me with a suddeness that seemed to leave it worse. We keep losing the good ones. :(
[info]tammy212 wrote:
Sep. 9th, 2007 11:27 pm (UTC)
>>We keep losing the good ones<<

We don't lose them. They stay with us all our lives--look at the other posts here, and think of what the people who are just discovering their books will say in another twenty, forty years.

And new good ones are coming up, not to take their places, but to expand the ranks.
[info]wytchchyld wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 11:04 pm (UTC)
*mourns quietly*
[info]mauvedragon wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2007 11:37 pm (UTC)
I only read A Wrinkle In Time this year for my Fantasy Narratives class. I was supremely unimpressed. Probably because I'm no longer Meg, and I felt her handling of themes was sloppy. Reading the comments here has shown why the book is considered something of classic though.
[info]shadowspun wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 12:05 am (UTC)
Two in one week. *sigh* Who's next? They do come in threes, unless Bette Hagman counts, even though she died August 17th.
[info]shehasathree wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 12:08 am (UTC)
oh, that's sad! and i don't even have my own copy of A Wrinkle in Time and now i really want to read it!
[info]odd_on_purpose wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 12:32 am (UTC)
A Wrinkle in Time and The Giver: Working together to define my childhood.
[info]kitmf wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 12:50 am (UTC)
She never really wrote me, though there were parts of me in several characters. Some of me was Emily Gregory, and some of me was Vicki Austin, and some of me was Poly. But the really important books she wrote for me were her journals - the Crosswicks Quartet. I never wanted HER life, but she gave me to understand that one could compose a life. That was critical. I am very sad tonight.
[info]kittylady wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 01:21 am (UTC)
She left a truly awesome legacy.

Having watched people suffer while trapped in their own bodies for years, I can say that I'm glad she's no longer hurting.
[info]dancingwriter wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 01:40 am (UTC)
It's so long since I last read A Wrinkle in Time; I guess this is the right occasion for a reread (especially now that I have your wonderful take on braces!). I'm sorry that she had to endure so many years of illness; it must indeed have been a relief to be released from that body. May she rest well.
[info]lilrivkah wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 01:43 am (UTC)
I still have my worn and battered first edition of A Ring of Endless Light which I've re-read every year since first discovering it on the back of a dusty library shelf in the seventh grade. Vicky Austin was such a relatable character with the same kind of teenage girl failings I knew I had. She was strong and intuitive, but also incredibly vulnerable to things like infatuation and resentment. Things I felt I knew already too well. What she did, however, was offer a bit of guidance and hope that even in the face of darkness, not all is given up and lost.

What seemed Madeleine L'Engle's greatest strength, however, was her ability to inject a feeling of spirituality and faith into science and physics while putting them into the perspective of our everyday human lives. In a way, you could see that to her, the stars and the cosmos and the way the universe works ARE a type of religion. A faith far above the petty callings of the state-sanctioned religions we most frequently cross. If it hadn't been for authors like her, I probably wouldn't be as spiritual AND scientific as I am today. She helped show how one doesn't necessarily negate the other.

I'm sad she died, but she lived a very long, whole life, and left a huge part of herself behind to live forever. :)
[info]usagi_alchemist wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 02:32 am (UTC)
A Wrinkle in Time was the book that introduced me to fantasy, as far as I can remember. It started ideas in my head that have never really left, even though I never read another of her books. It was also the first one with twins in it... Rest in peace, Ms L'engle.

While the barbed-wire idea is appealing, speaking as someone who's in the middle of six years of braces, you were probably lucky in that respect.
[info]mechanicaljewel wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 03:38 am (UTC)
Oh Goddess...

I am one of those people who has only read A Wrinkle in Time, and I only read it once, but it did indeed have quite an effect on me. I wanted to be Meg--what girl didn't? But more importantly, Ms. L'Engle gave me a new way of looking at the world and at fantasy fiction. I can trace the appeal of practically every sci-fi/fantasy book, movie, or comic that I love to the worldview Wrinkle presented.

So it goes.
[info]bookdivalia wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 04:21 am (UTC)
I've read twenty or so of her books. My world shifted considerably when I read Kit's entry.

Damn, the world blows sometimes.
[info]calanthe_b wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 04:46 am (UTC)
That's very sad news. I read quite a few of her books--unfortunately never liked any of them--but she was so important in the development of YA fiction, and especially fantasy, that I still feel it as a great loss.
[info]sabriel_0405 wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 05:32 am (UTC)
A Wrinkle in Time is the one book I'd take on a desert island. It has never gotten old for me since the first time I read it. I met her in 1992 and got the book signed. I got that one and A Swiftly Tilting Planet. Even at ALA's prices, I couldn't afford the trilogy. They were the best stories.
[info]randomblade wrote:
Sep. 8th, 2007 06:40 am (UTC)
Yes. A Wrinkle in Time was such a *right* book for me, when I read it. It fitted itself into my brain in the way that formative books do, and the memory of reading it and *feeling* it feels like a segment of my childhood.
[info]bartel_potter wrote:
Mar. 31st, 2010 11:54 am (UTC)
A Wrinkle in Time
It’s sad when an author passes away, especially when it’s an author that has written a book so close to our hearts. L’Engle’s 'A Wrinkle in Time' is a book that has been read by many a teenager. It is the story of Meg and Charles Murry, along with Calvin, and their quest to find Mr.Murry. The three cross the boundaries of time and space and visit other planets in their search. An unusual story, indeed. One that keeps your interest ‘til the end. I had read the book as a young adult and re-read it recently with the help of Shmoop. The site helped me immensely to understand the points that I had overlooked as a youngster. In her death, L’Engle may have passed through time and space, but her book `A Wrinkle in Time’ will entertain generations to come.
( 33 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Ideacodes