and Mohammed is his Prophet?"
"Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance):... "
The Book of Women 4.34, the Koran
Placed against this part of the holy book of Islam, I'm finding it very hard to make sense of this report of the acid-scarred female scholars of Afghanistan, and
a Saudi Arabian court's ruling that puts girls younger than 15 in the marriage beds of older men (though they're really not supposed to fuck their young wives till they reach puberty). Does anyone here care to place odds on how many of those husbands wait?
Where is the faith in the Koran? Where are the "protectors and maintainers of women"?
And yes, I know there are plenty of people in other faiths who don't follow the laws laid down in their holy books. I am making two points here: one, that these men are using the cover of religion to do what they do, and two, what they do is in the face of their faith, and is not endorsed by the bulk of those who follow the terms of their faith. There is good in Islam. But these acid-throwers, and this judge, could read their Koran all their lives and never see it.
"Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance):... "
The Book of Women 4.34, the Koran
Placed against this part of the holy book of Islam, I'm finding it very hard to make sense of this report of the acid-scarred female scholars of Afghanistan, and
a Saudi Arabian court's ruling that puts girls younger than 15 in the marriage beds of older men (though they're really not supposed to fuck their young wives till they reach puberty). Does anyone here care to place odds on how many of those husbands wait?
Where is the faith in the Koran? Where are the "protectors and maintainers of women"?
And yes, I know there are plenty of people in other faiths who don't follow the laws laid down in their holy books. I am making two points here: one, that these men are using the cover of religion to do what they do, and two, what they do is in the face of their faith, and is not endorsed by the bulk of those who follow the terms of their faith. There is good in Islam. But these acid-throwers, and this judge, could read their Koran all their lives and never see it.
- Location:frosty office
- Mood:
sad - Music:"Doll Parts," Hole

Comments
Is it going to bite me on the ass? I'm feeling kinda frangible this week.
Then I will wait a little, only because I'm presently reading a collection of short stories by an Auschwitz survivor and I'm a bit frangible. I made a mistake and broke my rule of one a day--just read two. I need to find something lighter to read until tomorrow.
Saudi child brides, meet your sister sex slaves in the FLDS. At least it's not supposed to be legal here.
Religion is supposed to help us be better people. In the wrong hands, it turns some people into monsters. And if there's a viable solution, I don't know what it is. Supposedly female education is the answer to, well, everything, but educating girls is too scary and dangerous in too much of the world. Plus ca change...
I started to add them and the girls of Tony Alamo's cult, and decided I was going to lose my focus. I never forget them, though.
OT
You have Yojimbo for your icon! Squee!!!
Paraphrase: "A lot of child abusers in this world need killing."
It's the same way that the Pro-Life fanatics make others who are Pro-Life look horrible, such as in this article:
http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/ript
While I'm Pro-Choice and Christian, it makes me often times want to bash my head into the wall when I hear stories like the one you posted and the "abortion donuts". Really, hasn't the world learned better by now?
I don't know if there is a religion that is free from people who turn it to evil purposes, and it really ticks me off. It's hard enough that the fundamentalist Christians give my own religion (paganism) such bad press, but then there are the people who go and ritually abuse children on my holidays, confirming that bad press. Ugh.
As for the Krispy Kreme thing, it reminds me of the church I was raised in, who were anti-Santa Claus (you can rearrange the letters in Santa and get Satan) and objected to the abbreviation Xmas because it "crossed out Christ." Um, folks. "Santa" means "saint" and that "X" stands for Christ. Seriously.
It's as bad as the feminists who object to the word "history" because that means it's all about men.
Save me from ignorant people who try to keep everyone else from thinking.
But thanks, Karisma Black, for posting about Krispy Kreme; maybe I'll snag a free donut on Tuesday! :)
Which one? Did I offend?
No, you didn't offend. I was simply referring to how in your entry you talk of people who are doing these horrible things and hiding behind a religion that does not endorse such an action. When I hear stories like this, I have to wonder why people of an organization/religion no longer live up to their names. Not to mention I dislike the people who judge a person based on the few fanatics who give these organizations/religions a bad name. Sorry if that was a little confusing!
They're actions make me sick, and practically the whole gaza region right now makes me sick, all of it!
They're all children, with big painful toys.
But all that I've read of the koran, I don't agree with and I don't like. That's my opinion.
Nutballs are nutballs. They come from everywhere. The majority of Muslims are just as decent as the majority of Jews, Christians, pagans, Hindus, Confucians, Shintoist, Buddhists, you name it.
As are all holy books. The prophet Samuel told King Saul God wanted him to kill every last living being of the enemy, right down to the infants and the sheep, and the Book of Revelations is just a nightmare that calls for the precipitation of a world-annihilating war just so the Righteous can ascend to Paradise. We can be literal, or we can follow the other precepts of those books, which say "thou shalt not kill," and "turn the other cheek."